Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40613419›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell science2025

Transcriptional adaptation after deletion of Cdc42 in primary T cells.

Adam M Rochussen, Claire Y Ma, Gillian M Griffiths

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam M RochussenUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Keith Peters Building, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9439-1206
Claire Y MaUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Keith Peters Building, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4244-7535
Gillian M GriffithsUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Keith Peters Building, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0434-5842

Funding

University of CambridgeWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 102163Wellcome Trust 217100Wellcome Trust 220543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cdc42 is a Rho family GTPase known for its central role in cell polarity and cytoskeletal regulation. To understand the role of Cdc42 in polarised secretion from cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) we used CRISPR/Cas9 gene deletion. Although Cdc42-deleted CTLs initially showed reduced cytotoxicity for up to 2 days after CRISPR-mediated deletion, full secretion and cytotoxicity was rapidly restored and even enhanced while CDC42 protein remained absent. In contrast, chemical inhibition of CDC42 using CASIN consistently decreased secretion in wild-type cells, but had no impact on Cdc42-deleted CTLs, confirming the specificity of this inhibitor. Comparative proteomics and transcriptomics of CTLs after Cdc42 deletion revealed transcriptional changes that could support improved T cell function, including compensation via other Rho GTPases. Targeting the promoter region of Cdc42 did not trigger transcriptional adaptation, consistent with a nonsense-mediated decay mechanism of genetic compensation. Our work highlights the importance of taking orthogonal approaches to study protein function and reveals the remarkable robustness of primary T cells to adapt to loss of an essential gene.

Indexed as

cdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinGene DeletionT-LymphocytesT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicTranscription, GeneticAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLcdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCdc42 protein, mouseCDC42CRISPR/Cas9Rho GTPaseT cellTranscriptional adaptation

Identifiers

PMID40613419
PMCPMC12377712

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.