Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40613616›Full record

SynthesisJournal of advanced nursing2026

Maternity Care Providers Perspectives and Experiences of Obstetric Violence in Low-, Middle- and High-Income Countries: An Integrative Review.

Emma C Collins, Elaine S Burns, Hazel Keedle, Hannah G Dahlen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma C CollinsWestern Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3774-8189
Elaine S BurnsWestern Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1388-6213
Hazel KeedleWestern Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1083-7843
Hannah G DahlenWestern Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-3078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore the perspectives and experiences of maternity care providers regarding obstetric violence across low-, middle-, and high-income countries.

designAn integrative review of the literature.

methodsA systematic literature search in CINAHL, Medline (via Ovid), SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from 2014 to 2024. Further papers were identified through a review of the reference lists of identified studies and through email alerts from searched databases. Articles were appraised using the applicable Joanna Briggs Institute qualitative or cross-sectional critical appraisal tool.

resultsTitle and abstract screen were undertaken on 2748 records. Fifty-four studies using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods designs were included. Maternity providers across all socio-economic levels described witnessing, and/or involvement in both respectful care and incidents of obstetric violence. The most common forms of obstetric violence were verbal and physical abuse, coercion, unconsented and unnecessary interventions, and violations of privacy and autonomy. Women who were socially marginalised, impoverished, and illiterate were vulnerable to obstetric violence. Differences were noted between low- and high-income countries, with detention of women for non-payment, privacy violations due to building design and lack of space, mistreatment due to HIV status, and women who were considered non-compliant being more vulnerable to obstetric violence in low-and low-middle-income countries. Obstetric violence was justified and normalised in the name of saving the baby, with less focus on the psychological health of the mother.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that obstetric violence is a gender-based violence enabled through patriarchal structures and power imbalances. Maternity providers are witnessing or enacting obstetric violence across low-, middle- and high-income countries, with significant impacts on women and maternity care providers alike. This review highlights opportunities for further research and action to develop health and legal frameworks to prevent instances of obstetric violence and improve outcomes for women and maternity care providers. IMPACT: A woman-centred approach underpinned by respectful maternity care has benefits for pregnant and birthing women. Obstetric violence, including verbal and physical abuse, coercion, and overmedicalisation, is prevalent in maternity services globally. This integrative review explored the perspectives and experiences of maternity care providers regarding obstetric violence across low-, middle-, and high-income countries. This review highlights the similarities and differences of witnessed, enacted, and perceived obstetric violence from the experience of maternity care providers. This review identifies the covert and overt nature of obstetric violence across low-, middle- and high-income countries. Gaining insight into provider perspectives across low-, middle-, and high-income countries may inform policy and practice reforms to eliminate obstetric violence and advance the provision of respectful maternity care. REPORTING

methodThis integrative review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDelivery, ObstetricHealth PersonnelMaternal Health ServicesViolenceAdultDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansPregnancygender based violencematernity nursingmidwiferyobstetrics and gynaecologyqualitative approachesquality of care

Identifiers

PMID40613616
PMCPMC12994647

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.