ReviewThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2025
Virtual humans in geriatric care: an integrative review.
Review in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Remote Virtual Interactive Agents for Older Adults: Exploring Its Science via Network Analysis and Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Fourth and Fifth Industrial Revolutions have introduced new and innovative technologies, such as artificial intelligence and virtual humanoids (VH) that offer promising solutions to health challenges among older adults. This project aims to provide an integrative review of VH concepts in geriatric care.
methodsScientific articles from reputable research databases (eg, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed) were extracted using relevant keywords and uploaded to the Covidence application for screening, full-text analysis, and extraction. A total of 36 articles were generated in the final stage of screening.
resultsThe 36 articles showcased various findings and insights on VH for geriatric care. More than half of the articles (66.67%) originated from the European region and were published in technology-related journals (55.56%). Most VH in the studies are used for social health interventions (33.3%), specifically for companionship purposes (25%). Furthermore, a great number of VH have average human likeness (55.56%) with the capacity to communicate with the end-user using pre-programmed responses (33.33%).
conclusionsThe use of VH in geriatric care has shifted from providing companionship (social) to delivering relevant instructions (educational) for health and well-being. Researchers from developing countries are providing increasing attention to VH studies involving multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary teams. The use of AI in VH development is limited, but it has the potential to transform geriatric care and the field of gerotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.