ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2025
Long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy for chronic limb-threatening ischemia patients with connective tissue disease.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with connective tissue disease (CTD) and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), revascularization is reported to be ineffective, with a poor prognosis and a high rate of lower-limb amputation. However, limited actual data are available. To study the long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy for CLTI patients with CTD, we established a multicenter registry (retrospective cohort study) in Japan. This study looked at major adverse extremity events, amputation-free survival, and all-cause mortality to better understand these rates. We registered 44 consecutive patients. The patients' mean age was 69.6 ± 11.4 years. There were 19 patients (43.2%) with diabetes, but only 4 patients (9.1%) were on dialysis. The average follow-up was 36.1 ± 31.7 months. In 11 patients (25.0%), the target wound healed without requiring lower-limb amputation. Target lesion revascularization occurred in 19 cases (43.2%), while unexpected minor amputations occurred in 11 cases (25.0%), major amputations in 8 cases (18.2%), and death in 15 cases (34.1%). The rates of freedom from major adverse extremity events at 1 and 3 years were 40.3% and 22.3%, respectively. The amputation-free survival rates were 69.3% at 1 year and 58.3% at 3 years. The survival rates were 85.5% at 1 year and 70.3% at 3 years. We conducted a multicenter study to look into the outcomes of CLTI patients with CTD who received endovascular therapy. Given the poor outcomes, more therapeutic advances for CLTI in CTD patients are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40613872What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.