ArticleCell genomics2025
Structural diversity and evolutionary constraints of oxidative phosphorylation.
Article in Cell genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptation of OXPHOS biogenesis to cellular requirements.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) system is central to metabolism. The more than 90 structural subunits are encoded by different chromosome categories (autosomal, X, and mtDNA). The system is envisioned as an invariant structure between cells and individuals. However, a comprehensive analysis of the 1,000 Genomes Project data reveals unexpected genetic intra-individual variability resulting from the heterozygosity of diploid autosomal genes, while diversity at the population level is generated by variability in mtDNA. We characterized the different levels of structural constriction at evolutionary and population levels for all OxPhos protein residues. To support this analysis, we developed ConScore, a conservation-based predictor of variant impact within OxPhos proteins (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC-AUC] = 0.97; area under the precision-recall curve [PR-AUC] = 0.94). Notably, for the nuclear-encoded subunits, we found mechanisms limiting individual variability as allelic imbalance or homozygosity bias. Integrating structural, functional, and genetic data, we highlight the significance of each OxPhos protein position, expanding insights into its role in speciation and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.