ReviewTransplantation and cellular therapy2025
Assessing cognitive function in transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor t cell therapy recipients: Expert recommendations from the survivorship, aging and biobehavioral special interest groups of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Review in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of neuroimaging in neurotoxicity after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in pediatric neurological autoimmune diseases: mechanisms, clinical applications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is a prevalent yet underexplored comorbidity and complication in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy. Affecting up to one-half of patients, cognitive impairment may include acute phases, manifesting as transplantation-associated altered mentation and encephalopathy or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and may persist for years post-treatment as cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). Such dysfunction undermines autonomy, healthcare management, work reintegration, and quality of life. This consensus review synthesizes current evidence on CRCI across the timeline of transplantation and cellular therapy (TCT), organized into pre-TCT, peri-TCT, and post-TCT phases, with additional focus on specific populations, including older adults and pediatric patients. It highlights gaps in the understanding of cognitive impairment risks, trajectory, and impact alongside the challenges of standardizing assessments in diverse practice settings. Key recommendations, endorsed by the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy's Aging, Biobehavioral Research, and Survivorship Special Interest Groups, advocate for cognitive assessment pretherapy and post-therapy using validated instruments such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment or Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test. We also recommend supplementation with patient-reported outcome measures for comprehensive evaluation. We recommend action items for cases in which cognitive impairment is identified, including exclusion of alternative etiologies, reconsideration of therapy or caregiving plans, and referrals for additional evaluation and rehabilitation, among others. Practical guidance for implementation across clinical and research settings is provided, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary strategies to address identified impairments. This work aims to establish a framework for systematic cognitive monitoring, improving patient outcomes and quality of life while guiding future research to address significant knowledge and implementation gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.