Evidence mapPaperPMID 40615428Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Self-supervised predictive learning accounts for cortical layer-specificity.

Kevin Kermani Nejad, Paul Anastasiades, Loreen Hertäg, Rui Ponte Costa

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin Kermani NejadCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Paul AnastasiadesDepartment of Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Whitson Street, Bristol, BS1 3NY, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5026-9006
Loreen HertägTechnische Universität Berlin & Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, 10115, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7838-3361
Rui Ponte CostaCentre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. rui.costa@dpag.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2595-2027

Funding

RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) 460088091RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/X006107/1Research Councils UK (RCUK) EP/Y027841/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neocortex constructs an internal representation of the world, but the underlying circuitry and computational principles remain unclear. Inspired by self-supervised learning algorithms, we propose a computational theory in which layer 2/3 (L2/3) integrates past sensory input, relayed via layer 4, with top-down context to predict incoming sensory stimuli. Learning is self-supervised by comparing L2/3 predictions with the latent representations of actual sensory input arriving at L5. We demonstrate that our model accurately predicts sensory information in context-dependent temporal tasks, and that its predictions are robust to noisy and occluded sensory input. Additionally, our model generates layer-specific sparsity, consistent with experimental observations. Next, using a sensorimotor task, we show that the model's L2/3 and L5 prediction errors mirror mismatch responses observed in awake, behaving mice. Finally, through manipulations, we offer testable predictions to unveil the computational roles of various cortical features. In summary, our findings suggest that the multi-layered neocortex empowers the brain with self-supervised predictive learning.

Indexed as

LearningModels, NeurologicalNeocortexAlgorithmsAnimalsFemaleMaleMice

Identifiers

PMID40615428
PMCPMC12227776

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.