ArticleCommunications biology2025
Aversive experiences induce valence plasticity of instructive signals to change future learning rules in mice.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optogenetic LTP Manipulation and Mathematical Modeling to Investigate Value Plasticity of the Instructive Signal in Mice.Bio-protocol · 2026Article
- Aversive experiences induce valence plasticity of instructive signals to change future learning rules in mice.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aversive signals such as pain serve an instructive role in aversive learning to promote animal survival. While negative valence of aversive signals is considered to be innately assigned, the valence can be scaled by internal state and previous experiences. However, the neuronal mechanisms underlying state and experience-dependent valence modulation remain unexplored. Previous studies demonstrated synaptic potentiation in instructive signal pathways following robust aversive learning. Here, we hypothesized that long-term potentiation (LTP) in the parabrachial-to-central amygdala (PB-CeC/L) pathway, an important nociceptive circuit for producing pain and emotional learning, enhances the negative valence and thereby alter future learning rules. To test this hypothesis, we developed pathway-specific in vivo LTP induction methods and mathematical models. Our results suggest that LTP in the PB-CeC/L pathway alters aversive valence and future learning rules by enhancing subsequent learning and memory generalization. These results may help to identify a therapeutic target for post-traumatic stress disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.