ArticleScientific reports2025
Medical slice transformer for improved diagnosis and explainability on 3D medical images with DINOv2.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting lung cancer survival with attention-based CT slices combination.Health information science and systems · 2026Article
- A multimodal prediction model for brain hematoma expansion based on deep neural network with transformer-driven collaborative attention fusion.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of deep learning models in differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Quantifying User Satisfaction: Weighted Metric Approach for Evaluating Deep Learning-Based Thigh MRI Segmentations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Explainable Transformer-Based Framework for Lung Cancer Classification and Automated Radiology Report Generation from Multi-Slice CT Images.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- A comprehensive bedside chest radiography dataset with structured, itemized and graded radiologic reports.Scientific data · 2026Article
- AID-FGS: Artificial intelligence-enabled diagnosis of female genital schistosomiasis: Preliminary findings.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- SpatialDINO: A Self-Supervised 3D Vision Transformer that enables Segmentation and Tracking in Crowded Cellular Environments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based prediction of cerebral white matter hyperintensity burden using carotid magnetic resonance angiography.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) are essential clinical cross-sectional imaging techniques for diagnosing complex conditions. However, large 3D datasets with annotations for deep learning are scarce. While methods like DINOv2 are encouraging for 2D image analysis, these methods have not been applied to 3D medical images. Furthermore, deep learning models often lack explainability due to their "black-box" nature. This study aims to extend 2D self-supervised models, specifically DINOv2, to 3D medical imaging while evaluating their potential for explainable outcomes. We introduce the Medical Slice Transformer (MST) framework to adapt 2D self-supervised models for 3D medical image analysis. MST combines a Transformer architecture with a 2D feature extractor, i.e., DINOv2. We evaluate its diagnostic performance against a 3D convolutional neural network (3D ResNet) across three clinical datasets: breast MRI (651 patients), chest CT (722 patients), and knee MRI (1199 patients). Both methods were tested for diagnosing breast cancer, predicting lung nodule dignity, and detecting meniscus tears. Diagnostic performance was assessed by calculating the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). Explainability was evaluated through a radiologist's qualitative comparison of saliency maps based on slice and lesion correctness. P-values were calculated using Delong's test. MST achieved higher AUC values compared to ResNet across all three datasets: breast (0.94 ± 0.01 vs. 0.91 ± 0.02, P = 0.02), chest (0.95 ± 0.01 vs. 0.92 ± 0.02, P = 0.13), and knee (0.85 ± 0.04 vs. 0.69 ± 0.05, P = 0.001). Saliency maps were consistently more precise and anatomically correct for MST than for ResNet. Self-supervised 2D models like DINOv2 can be effectively adapted for 3D medical imaging using MST, offering enhanced diagnostic accuracy and explainability compared to convolutional neural networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.