Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40615608›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Medical slice transformer for improved diagnosis and explainability on 3D medical images with DINOv2.

Gustav Müller-Franzes, Firas Khader, Robert Siepmann, Tianyu Han, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gustav Müller-FranzesDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany. gumueller@ukaachen.de.
Firas KhaderDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Robert SiepmannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Tianyu HanDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Jakob Nikolas KatherElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sven Nebelung *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Daniel Truhn *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) are essential clinical cross-sectional imaging techniques for diagnosing complex conditions. However, large 3D datasets with annotations for deep learning are scarce. While methods like DINOv2 are encouraging for 2D image analysis, these methods have not been applied to 3D medical images. Furthermore, deep learning models often lack explainability due to their "black-box" nature. This study aims to extend 2D self-supervised models, specifically DINOv2, to 3D medical imaging while evaluating their potential for explainable outcomes. We introduce the Medical Slice Transformer (MST) framework to adapt 2D self-supervised models for 3D medical image analysis. MST combines a Transformer architecture with a 2D feature extractor, i.e., DINOv2. We evaluate its diagnostic performance against a 3D convolutional neural network (3D ResNet) across three clinical datasets: breast MRI (651 patients), chest CT (722 patients), and knee MRI (1199 patients). Both methods were tested for diagnosing breast cancer, predicting lung nodule dignity, and detecting meniscus tears. Diagnostic performance was assessed by calculating the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). Explainability was evaluated through a radiologist's qualitative comparison of saliency maps based on slice and lesion correctness. P-values were calculated using Delong's test. MST achieved higher AUC values compared to ResNet across all three datasets: breast (0.94 ± 0.01 vs. 0.91 ± 0.02, P = 0.02), chest (0.95 ± 0.01 vs. 0.92 ± 0.02, P = 0.13), and knee (0.85 ± 0.04 vs. 0.69 ± 0.05, P = 0.001). Saliency maps were consistently more precise and anatomically correct for MST than for ResNet. Self-supervised 2D models like DINOv2 can be effectively adapted for 3D medical imaging using MST, offering enhanced diagnostic accuracy and explainability compared to convolutional neural networks.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingBreast NeoplasmsDeep LearningFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID40615608
PMCPMC12227771

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.