ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of acute stress exposure on genome-wide DNA methylation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute stress induces changes in epigenome-wide DNA methylation.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Association between chronic stress and the epigenome: Exploration of psychological and biological stress.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA methylation (DNAm) is a stable epigenetic modification, yet plasticity in DNAm is associated with exposure to a broad range of experiences. Evidence from animal studies suggests that acute stress can induce DNAm changes in adulthood. However, there has been limited exploration of plasticity in the human epigenome in response to acute stress. In the current study we examine whether acute stress-induced shifts in DNAm occur in male (N = 27) and female (N = 28 female) participants who undergo a lab-based stress-induction protocol. Results from our within-subjects design indicate that acute stress induces both hypermethylation and hypomethylation in salivary DNA, including CpG sites within the GATA3, NINL, BACH2, PHACTR1 and KRTAP19-3 genes. Sex-specific effects of acute stress were found within the COL4A1 gene, with females exhibiting an increase, and males exhibiting a decrease in DNAm following acute stress. Further, we found that psychological stress reactivity (but not cortisol reactivity) predicted post-stress DNAm, and cortisol reactivity (but not psychological stress reactivity) predicted epigenetic aging. Taken together, these novel findings (a) support the hypothesis that DNAm can shift in response to an acute stressor, and (b) highlight the importance of understanding the unique pathways through which hormonal versus psychological responses to stress influence the epigenome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.