ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Improving nerve and muscle function: an exploration of targeted nerve function replacement following differential delay periods in a rat model.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTargeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) improves real-time control of EMG-based prostheses by connecting severed nerves to adjacent muscles, creating new EMG signals. However, TMR requires cutting original nerve connections, which can cause denervation atrophy and limit functional recovery. As an alternative, Targeted Nerve Function Replacement (TNFR) offers a fundamentally different approach by establishing a direct end-to-end anastomosis between an intact donor nerve and the original nerve of a target muscle, preserving existing neural pathways while providing supplementary neural input. This study evaluates TNFR efficacy in restoring denervated muscle function across different postoperative intervals in a rat model.
methodsThirty Sprague-Dawley rats (220-250 g) were divided into five equal groups (n = 6 per group): control (no transection), denervated (transection without repair), immediate TNFR after median nerve transection, 2-week delayed TNFR, and 4-week delayed TNFR. The median nerve was selected for reinnervation with the musculocutaneous nerve innervating the brachialis muscle serving as the anastomosis target. All assessments were conducted 4 weeks post-TNFR intervention, including intramuscular bipolar EMG recordings (1024 Hz sampling rate), behavioral assessment, muscle tension measurement, dorsal root ganglia (DRG) histology, and spinal cord motor neuron evaluation.
resultsImmediate TNFR significantly outperformed delayed interventions across all parameters. EMG amplitude and root mean square values were significantly higher in the immediate group (P < 0.05). Maximum contraction and tetanic contraction forces of biceps brachii showed superior recovery with immediate TNFR (P < 0.05). Histological examination revealed greater preservation of DRG sensory neurons following TNFR (P < 0.05). Immunofluorescence showed better preservation of synaptic protein expression in spinal cord motor neurons with immediate intervention. Immediate TNFR also prevented autophagic behavior seen in delayed intervention groups, suggesting improved neuropathic pain prevention.
conclusionTiming critically influences TNFR outcomes, with immediate intervention yielding optimal restoration of both motor and sensory functions. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing surgical strategies in peripheral nerve injury, with important implications for limb reconstruction, rehabilitation protocols, and prosthetic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.