ArticleBMC nutrition2025
Effect of single-parent versus dual-parent households on dietary intake and growth among under-five children in Rwanda: an analysis using directed acyclic graph.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPoor childhood diet and malnutrition are global issues, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Adequate nutrition during the early years of life is crucial for optimal child growth. Household dynamics influence children's well-being, with single-parent households facing unique challenges that can affect dietary intake and growth. In Rwanda, stunting and being underweight are still prevalent, and the role of household structure has not been studied. This study assessed the relationship of single parent in comparison to dual parent households with children's dietary intake and growth together with the mediating role of wealth in these relationships. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study used secondary data from the 2019/2020 Rwanda Demographics and Health Survey (DHS). The analysis included 3,531 children under five years of age from dual and single parent households at the time of the survey, with a specific focus on 2332 children aged 6-23 months for dietary assessment. To estimate the associations, we performed survey-weighted multivariate logistic regressions using binary outcomes, adjusting for confounders identified by a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Mediation analysis was performed using structural equation modeling (SEM) for continuous outcomes and generalized structural equation modeling (GSEM) for binary outcomes to explore the mediating effect of wealth on the relationships among household structure, the minimum acceptable diet (MAD), and child growth. Both models accounted for the complex sampling design.
resultsAmong the 3,531 participants, 26.9% lived in single-parent households. Stunting was observed in 34% of the children, while 8.3% were underweight, 1% experienced wasting, and only 21.1% of the children aged 6-23 months met MAD. Single-parent households were significantly associated with stunting (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.01-1.46) and wasting (OR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.11-3.99) but were not associated with underweight or MAD. Household structure indirectly influenced MAD (indirect effect (IE) = -0.007, p = 0.02), height-for-age (IE = -0.068, p < 0.001), and weight-for-age z scores (IE = -0.029, p = 0.001) through wealth, but no mediation effect was observed for height-for-weight z scores.
conclusionThis study highlights the influence of family structure on children's dietary intake and growth in Rwanda. To effectively combat malnutrition in Rwanda and similar settings, targeted interventions should address household structure, particularly that of single-parent households, and wealth disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.