ReviewMikrochimica acta2025
Microfluidic paper-based analytical extraction devices (µPAEDs): a cost-effective and portable solution for biomarkers, contaminants and VOC detection.
Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Paper-Based Microfluidic Devices: A Powerful Strategy for Rapid Detection.Micromachines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human body relies on various biological and environmental cues, and regulatory processes for basic functioning and maintenance of health. Thus, by monitoring these cues, which include biomarkers and chemical contaminants, scientists and health professionals can prioritize the health, well-being, and longevity of the general population. These analytes are found in biological and other fluids and are usually extracted using conventional extraction methods like liquid-liquid or solid-phase extraction. Until recently, these methods were used in tandem with conventional detection techniques like LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS. However, this inept combination proves to be disadvantageous for the general population due to its higher costs, requirement of specialized equipment and experienced personnel, usage of several organic and environmentally harmful reagents, and a centralized approach. Thus, recently there has been a rise in the usage of microfluidics, particularly µPADs and conventional extraction techniques. By capitalizing on the multifarious advantages of µPADs, including affordability, miniaturization, and dispensable equipment, researchers have developed all-in-one microfluidic paper-based analytical extraction devices (µPAEDs). This approach mitigates the risks associated with the former and improves costs, transportability, and accessibility. Additionally, this novel approach has also been applied to non-invasive detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In this review, we highlight the advancements of µPAEDs to detect myriads of biomarkers and chemical contaminants in samples like blood, breath, and water.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.