Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40616626›Full record

ReviewCurrent obesity reports2025

A Hypothesis on the Historical Development of Obesity that is Not Only About Food.

Faidon Magkos

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current obesity reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. How does obesity develop-and are specific foods to blame?Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Faidon MagkosDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. fma@nexs.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1312-7364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMany physiological models have been put forth to explain the pathogenesis of obesity. All causes must eventually act by altering energy intake, energy expenditure, or the metabolic handling of ingested nutrients to favor storage over oxidation. These mechanisms culminate in two apparently competing models-the Energy Balance Model (EBM) and the Carbohydrate Insulin Model (CIM). In the EBM, eating more precedes increased adiposity, whereas in the CIM, increased adiposity precedes eating more. RECENT

findingsEpidemiological observations on energy intake and obesity prevalence during the last 50 years have often become the source of controversy between models. Here, I present a hypothesis, which borrows key elements from the EBM and CIM, and offers a framework that traces the root cause of obesity outside of the modern food environment and aligns with historical, 100-year-long trends in metabolic rate, food intake, physical activity, and adiposity. Body weight has been steadily increasing throughout the previous century, in conjunction with reductions in resting metabolic rate. This, superimposed with varying changes in dietary energy intake and physical activity energy expenditure resulted in an accelerated rise in obesity prevalence after the 1970s. Obesity is a multifactorial disease and alterations in the underlying metabolic pathways that synergize to promote net fat deposition in the body have likely been operating for many decades, if not centuries, and involve both food-related and non-food-related factors.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeEnergy MetabolismObesityAdiposityDietExerciseHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansAdiposityEnergy expenditureEnergy intakeObesogenicPathogenesisTrendsWeight gain

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.