Observational studyPediatric cardiology2026
Macitentan in Children with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Multicenter Experience.
Observational study in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Macitentan in Japanese Pediatric Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label Study.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- A second-hit conceptual framework for pulmonary arterial hypertension in adult congenital heart disease: genetics, hemodynamics, and treat-and-repair.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macitentan seems to improve outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Nevertheless, safety and efficacy in pediatric patients is still to be determined. Multi-center, observational study to assess safety and efficacy of oral macitentan in patients under 18 years-of-age from the Spanish Registry of Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension with group 1 PAH. Outcome measures included changes in the World Health Organization Functional Class (WHO FC) from baseline to month 6, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), NT-proBNP levels, risk-stratification, echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters, and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Seventy-four patients (median age 9.6 years) with PAH were included in the study, of which thirty-one had idiopathic/heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension and 43 had PAH associated with congenital heart disease. Significant clinical improvement was observed after 6 months of treatment with macitentan: The percentage of patients on WHO FC III/IV decreased from 48 to 22% (p = 0.001); mean 6MWD (n = 42) increased significantly in around 45 m (p = 0.032); NT-proBNP decreased a mean of - 438.9 ± 175 pg/ml, (p = 0.015). There was a 17% increase in the number of patients meeting all three low-risk parameters of 17% (p = 0.002). Side effects were detected in four patients (5.4%). Macitentan was discontinued in one patient. Disease progression was observed in 6 patients despite macitentan therapy. This study provided evidence on the clinical benefits and good tolerance of macitentan in paediatric population with group I PAH treated in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40616677What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.