Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40617592›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2025

Applications of human factors approaches and methods to the development of teleconsultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review.

Aimee Ferguson, Rosemary Newham, Emma Dunlop, Kate Preston, Marion Bennie

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aimee FergusonUniversity of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK aimee.denver-wason@nhs.scot.ORCID 0000-0002-5195-3667
Rosemary NewhamUniversity of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Emma DunlopUniversity of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Kate PrestonUniversity of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Marion BennieUniversity of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGiven the level of encouragement seen in recent policy, it is important to understand how teleconsultation technologies are designed, implemented and used in primary care settings to further encourage their use. Despite being an area of research warranting interest from the area of human factors, knowledge of the discipline's application is scarce. This systematic scoping review aimed to identify human factors approaches and methods previously applied to the development of teleconsultation technologies in primary care.

methodsMedline, Embase, PsycINFO, Ergonomics Abstracts and Engineering Village were searched for peer-reviewed articles. Included studies were published 2010 onwards, focused on the development of teleconsultation technologies in primary care and adopted an approach or method fitting within the domain of human factors. Key findings underwent a content analysis.

results70 studies were identified, most published 2019 onwards. The review identified 20 human factors approaches, the majority of which were applied to evaluate the use of teleconsultations, with less focus on the design and implementation stages. A variety of data collection methods, theories, models and frameworks were found. Although the focus of all studies fits within the domain of human factors, none of the included studies referred to 'human factors' explicitly.

conclusionsThe findings illustrate approaches that have been applied when designing, implementing and evaluating the use of teleconsultations. Although the studies may not have intended to adopt a human factors lens, the approaches used relate to the wider discipline. Further analysis of the studies evaluating use could provide insight into how these technologies are being used and the factors influencing use.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsRemote ConsultationHumansPrimary Health CareHuman factorsPRIMARY CARETelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40617592
PMCPMC12228460

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.