ArticleBMC women's health2025
Navigating healthcare in higher education for students with gynaecological pain: an exploratory survey.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Menstrual health among young adults in Latin America and the Caribbean: A scoping review and evidence-gap map.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUniversity students face unique challenges in accessing healthcare, particularly women who experience painful gynaecological conditions. These conditions can impact their quality of life and educational engagement. Gynaecological pain is frequently misattributed as ‘normal’ dysmenorrhea, leading to delays in seeking medical advice and diagnosis. Research on how women with gynaecological conditions navigate healthcare is lacking in a UK higher education context. This study aims to explore university students’ experiences of gynaecological pain within higher education, and how they navigate healthcare.
methodsA web-based questionnaire integrating quantitative and qualitative items distributed to university students in England. The survey included the Menstrual Symptoms Index (MSI) to assess the severity and frequency of symptoms. Questions explored experience of accessing healthcare for gynaecological pain and the impact of symptoms on aspects of daily life and educational engagement. This project was supported by an advisory group comprising relevant stakeholders.
resultsThe study included 70 university students, predominantly aged 18–24. Gynaecological pain was highly prevalent, but 52% of participants had not spoken to a healthcare professional about this, 56% were not taking pain medication, and 80% had not sought university support. This was most typically due to normalisation of symptoms. Some participants had difficulties accessing healthcare around university commitments. Many reported negative experiences with healthcare professionals who dismissed or minimised their pain, particularly among younger participants. This pain impacted educational engagement with participants reporting difficulties in concentrating, attending classes, and completing assignments. Participants felt supported by individual university tutors but experienced difficulties navigating the procedural landscape of university to access accommodations. Students would benefit from greater awareness of the impact of gynaecological conditions among academic and healthcare professions.
conclusionsGynaecological pain has a significant impact on university students’ educational engagement. There is a need for better support systems within universities, including improved awareness and understanding of gynaecological pain among staff and flexible academic policies. Training for healthcare providers to recognise and validate gynaecological pain is also essential. Addressing these issues can improve the quality of life for students and enhance their participation in educational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.