Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40618154›Full record

ReviewJournal of ovarian research2025

Molecular, cellular, biochemical, and rehabilitative insights into exercise interventions for gynecological cancer prevention and survivorship: a narrative review.

Yubing Wang, Melika Malek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yubing WangCollege of Physical Education, Qilu Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, 250200, China. wyb_1258@163.com.
Melika MalekShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. melikamalek862@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review paper investigated existing literature on the relationship between physical activity, exercise, and gynecological cancers, focusing on ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers. Epidemiological studies consistently demonstrate an inverse association between physical activity levels and the risk of developing gynecological cancers, as well as improved survival outcomes among cancer survivors engaging in regular exercise. Mechanistic insights suggest that physical activity and exercise may modulate key pathways involved in carcinogenesis, tumor progression, and treatment response, offering promising avenues for preventive and adjunctive therapeutic interventions. However, despite a growing body of research in exercise oncology, there is a lack of disease-specific synthesis addressing how exercise can be tailored to the distinct pathophysiological, treatment-related, and psychosocial challenges of gynecological cancers. Current guidelines often generalize exercise recommendations across all cancer types, overlooking the unique symptom burdens, such as pelvic floor dysfunction, sarcopenia, and menopausal symptoms, specific to gynecologic malignancies. This review addresses this gap by examining the evidence base for exercise in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers, with an emphasis on mechanistic, clinical, and rehabilitative dimensions. By integrating epidemiological findings with preclinical and intervention data, this work aims to establish a gynecologic-specific framework for exercise prescription. This review underscores the importance of multidisciplinary research efforts to optimize lifestyle interventions, inform evidence-based guidelines, and improve outcomes for individuals affected by gynecological cancers.

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyGenital Neoplasms, FemaleCancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansSurvivorshipCervical cancerEndometrial cancerExerciseGynecological cancersOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID40618154
PMCPMC12228313

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.