ReviewBiological psychiatry2025
The Interplay Between Sleep and Mental Health: A Genetic Perspective.
Review in Biological psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sleep and Mental Health: Unveiling the Critical Role of Sleep in Brain Function and Psychiatric Disorders.Biological psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although many facets of sleep, including subjective, behavioral, and neurophysiological features, are closely linked with psychiatric disorders, the natures of these relationships are generally unclear. A given alteration in sleep could reflect a cause (that may mediate genetic risk), consequence, symptom, trigger, epiphenomenon due to shared determinants, or some combination of these. In principle, genetic approaches can be informative: 1) by identifying specific genetic influences on disease mediated by or shared with sleep, which could help the search for biological mechanisms and therapeutic targets, and 2) by providing evidence for causality, which could suggest interventions for modifiable sleep traits. Here, we summarize recent human quantitative and molecular genetic studies on sleep and psychiatric disease, including twin and genome-wide association studies. Despite evidence for shared heritability across many domains, notably depression and insomnia, the field is in its early stages and faces significant challenges including the following: 1) putative causal effects are small, phenotypically nonspecific, not resolved to specific gene pathways, and often bidirectional; 2) most current discovery cohorts are demographically biased and do not capture profound age-related changes in sleep and its genetic architecture; 3) group-level analyses ignore patient-to-patient heterogeneity, including the presence or absence of specific sleep alterations; and 4) a paucity of objective, brain-based data in genetically informative samples hampers making connections with sleep neurophysiology. Nonetheless, as ever-growing genetic tools and resources still hold great potential for translational bridges between basic model systems, human epidemiology, and personalized clinical care, genetic approaches will still likely be needed to reveal sleep's roles in maintaining mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.