ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2025
HSP104 and HSP20-L Are Required by Aspergillus nidulans in Response to Attack by Fungivorous Springtail Sinella curviseta.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HSP104 and HSP20-L Are Required by Aspergillus nidulans in Response to Attack by Fungivorous Springtail Sinella curviseta.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are conserved biomolecules that are consistently expressed and upregulated in response to stress. However, whether fungi activate HSPs in response to fungivorous arthropods' attack remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the function of HSP104 and HSP20-L in Aspergillus nidulans upon Sinella curviseta stress. The results revealed that hsp104 and hsp20-L were upregulated upon the stress. Knockout of hsp104 and/or hsp20-L inhibited conidia and cleistothecia formation. Additionally, S. curviseta stress inhibited conidia and cleistothecia formation in the wild-type strain. hsp104 positively regulated conidia formation in response to stress, while hsp20-L negatively regulated it. Notably, hsp104 and hsp20-L exhibited opposing functions on ascospore formation upon biotic stress. The absence of hsp104 and/or hsp20-L and S. curviseta stress resulted in increased cellular damage. During asexual development, both hsp104 and hsp20-L promoted chitin and β-glucan synthesis and catalase activity. During sexual development, only chitin synthesis was enhanced in Δhsp104 and Δhsp20-L. Under S. curviseta stress, HSP104 promoted chitin synthesis and catalase activity during asexual development, whereas HSP20-L promoted chitin and trehalose synthesis and superoxide dismutase activity during sexual development. Collectively, our results suggest that hsp104 and hsp20-L play a role in response to S. curviseta stress to maintain homeostasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.