ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology2026
Implementing Teletrials to Improve Equity of Access for Regional Patients With Cancer: Report From the Victorian Teletrial Collaborative.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Network-Integrated Platform for Clinical Trial Navigation from the New South Wales Early Phase Clinical Trials Alliance.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Progress and challenges in expanding access to clinical trials in pancreatic cancer.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Implementing Teletrials to Improve Equity of Access for Regional Patients With Cancer: Report From the Victorian Teletrial Collaborative.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe uptake of telehealth, including for clinical trials (teletrials), accelerated during the pandemic and helps address inequity of access for underserved populations. This report discusses the work of experts in Victoria to implement teletrials in cancer clinical trials but has learnings for other jurisdictions and in other disease types.
methodsThree funded programs in Victoria (the Regional Trials Network Victoria, Trial Hub Alfred, and the Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance), each tasked with improving access to clinical trials for regional patients, formed the Victorian Teletrial Collaborative. In addition, they coordinated work with the Australian Teletrial Program and Safer Care Victoria. The Collaborative, backed with a Memorandum of Understanding and using a collective impact framework, held a workshop and developed a workplan and program logic. It met monthly to make progress against the workplan, which had four main themes: governance/logistics, education/training, advocacy/awareness, and operational Processes.
resultsThe Collaborative developed operational templates, toolkits for consumers and clinicians, education and training modules, and discussion papers to help overcome barriers to the implementation of teletrials. It conducted a workshop of national experts to consider barriers and enablers for the implementation of teletrials in early-phase clinical trials and developed a masterclass for clinicians. Future work plans focus on advocacy and communication about teletrials.
conclusionThe Victorian Teletrial Collaborative has utilized an evidence-based approach to develop a series of toolkits and recommendations aimed at facilitating the sustainable uptake of teletrials in our jurisdiction and elsewhere.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.