ArticleBMC oral health2025
Exploring the divide between dental clinicians and academics for more inclusive partnerships: perspectives on building a research network.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDentists experience barriers of applying knowledge at point of care. In recent years, integrated knowledge translation (IKT) efforts, such as dental practice research networks, have been established in the US and other countries to overcome the potential barriers to dental clinicians being involved in research. In Canada, there is no formal network. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of dental clinicians and academics in building a network in Ontario that would encourage research collaboration.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted to collect data from dental clinicians and academics in Ontario dental schools. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit participants from the Faculty of Dentistry at the University of Toronto and Schulich School of Dentistry at Western University. Interviews were conducted via Zoom meetings between July and November 2023. Interviews were recorded, de-identified, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Strategies to promote rigour were applied throughout the research process.
resultsTwenty-six interviews were conducted (twelve dental clinicians and fourteen academics). Most participants described a divide impacting many aspects of oral health research. This divide appeared to be originating from historical cultural norms rooted in the development of organized dentistry in Ontario, current financial strains faced by dentists, and misalignment of values that resulted in miscommunications between dental clinicians and academics. Despite the divide, there appeared to be a strong desire among participants to "bridge the divide". Suggestions included starting a small network of interested individuals, enforcing existing collaborations within the universities, identifying champions in organized dentistry to advocate for establishing a formal network in Ontario, and exploring opportunities to support such a network in Canada. DISCUSSION: Despite the divide between dental clinicians and academics in oral health research, there appeared to be a strong desire to bridge the divide. This study is novel in that it reports dental clinicians' and academics' perceptions and experiences with IKT partnerships in dentistry. We offer recommendations for oral health professional leaders to build a new network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.