ArticleThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing
Impact of Nurse-Led Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Management Program on 1-Year Outcomes in Patients on Hemodialysis Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Article in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular complications are a major concern for hemodialysis patients with chronic kidney disease, especially post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The authors of this study investigated the impact of a nurse-led cardiovascular risk assessment and management program on 1-year outcomes in these patients.
methodsA retrospective secondary analysis was conducted on the data of 267 patients receiving hemodialysis due to chronic kidney disease who underwent PCI. The data of patients were divided into a nurse-led care group (n = 129) receiving nurse-led care and a usual care group (n = 138) receiving usual care. The nurse-led group received personalized treatment, health education, psychological support, skill training, and regular follow-ups over 1 year. Assessments of cardiovascular risk, laboratory characteristics, psychological status, quality of life (Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire), and major adverse cardiovascular events were conducted at discharge and after 1 year.
resultsAt 1 year, the nurse-led care group showed greater reductions in cardiovascular risk compared with the usual care group. The levels of serum creatinine, uric acid, and blood lipid in the nurse-led care group were significantly improved. Psychological assessments revealed reduced anxiety and depression scores in the nurse-led care group. Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire quality of life scores were higher in the nurse-led care group in several domains. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, particularly cardiogenic shock, was significantly reduced in the nurse-led care group.
conclusionNurse-led cardiovascular risk management significantly improves cardiovascular risk profiles, psychological health, and quality of life, while reducing major adverse cardiovascular event incidence in patients receiving hemodialysis due to chronic kidney disease post PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.