Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40619737›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of haematology2025

Final Results From a Large, Non-Interventional, Phase 4 Study of Ruxolitinib for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis in Clinical Routine.

Steffen Koschmieder, Susanne Isfort, Clemens Schulte, Lutz Jacobasch, Thomas Geer, Marcel Reiser, Michael Koenigsmann, Bernhard Heinrich, Jürgen Wehmeyer, Eyck von der Heyde and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05044026 (A Prospective, Two-arm, Non Interventional Study of JAKAVI®), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05044026 completednot on this map

A Prospective, Two-arm, Non Interventional Study of JAKAVI® (Ruxolitinib) in Patients With Myelofibrosis

TypeobservationalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2012 to 2022Enrolled1,012ConditionsPrimary Myelofibrosis, Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis, Post-essential Thrombocythemia MyelofibrosisArmsJakavi
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Steffen KoschmiederDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1011-8171
Susanne IsfortDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2855-561X
Clemens SchulteGemeinschaftspraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Dortmund, Germany.
Lutz JacobaschGemeinschaftspraxis Hämatologie-Onkologie, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas GeerMedizinische Klinik III, Diakonie-Klinikum Schwäbisch Hall, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany.
Marcel ReiserPraxis Internistischer Onkologie und Hämatologie, Köln, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-7793
Michael KoenigsmannOnkologisches Ambulanzzentrum (OAZ) Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Bernhard HeinrichHämatologie-Onkologie im Zentrum MVZ GmbH, Augsburg, Germany.
Jürgen WehmeyerGemeinschaftspraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Münster, Germany.
Eyck von der HeydeOnkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Dres. Ingo Zander und Eyck von der Heyde, Hannover, Germany.
Hans TeschOnkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis am Bethanien-Krankenhaus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Benedikt GröschlProviding services for Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany.
Petra BachhuberNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany.
Susanne GroßerNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany.
Michael KoehlerSpecialty Practice for Psycho-Oncology, Magdeburg, Germany.
Heike L PahlDepartment of Medicine I, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

Novartis Pharma
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

JAKoMo was a long-term, multicenter, non-interventional study observing the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QOL) effects of ruxolitinib (RUX), managed per clinical routine at investigator discretion, for treatment of 943 patients with myelofibrosis (MF) in 122 German centers. Patients ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of PMF or PPV-MF or PET-MF, who were suitable for in-label treatment with RUX were eligible and could be included either before (479 previously RUX-naïve [Arm A]) or after the start of treatment (464 RUX-experienced patients [Arm B]) and were followed over 36 months. Arm A showed rapid (≤ 6 months), sustained improvements from baseline in all efficacy outcomes and most QOL measures. Both arms showed an ~17% increase in the proportion of patients experiencing a normal German QOL during follow-up. Arm B entered the study with better outcomes and QOL than Arm A, with outcomes generally remaining stable over time. Adverse events were less common than in registrational trials, possibly due, in part, to lower real-world RUX dosing. Survival was comparable to published data. The JAKoMo study demonstrates that real-world RUX treatment of MF promotes significant and sustained clinical and QOL benefits, including improvement of general health and alleviation of MF-associated fatigue. Maximum sustained responses were generally achieved within 6 months and associated with fewer adverse events than in published randomized trials, which may reflect more conservative and personalized real-world dosing. Trial Registration: The JAKOMO trial: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05044026.

Indexed as

Primary MyelofibrosisPyrazolesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesPyrimidinesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinibclinical routinemyelofibrosisreal‐life analysisruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID40619737
PMCPMC12402862

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.