Observational studyEuropean journal of haematology2025
Final Results From a Large, Non-Interventional, Phase 4 Study of Ruxolitinib for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis in Clinical Routine.
Observational study in European journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05044026 (A Prospective, Two-arm, Non Interventional Study of JAKAVI®), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Two-arm, Non Interventional Study of JAKAVI® (Ruxolitinib) in Patients With Myelofibrosis
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Final Results From a Large, Non-Interventional, Phase 4 Study of Ruxolitinib for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis in Clinical Routine.European journal of haematology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
JAKoMo was a long-term, multicenter, non-interventional study observing the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QOL) effects of ruxolitinib (RUX), managed per clinical routine at investigator discretion, for treatment of 943 patients with myelofibrosis (MF) in 122 German centers. Patients ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of PMF or PPV-MF or PET-MF, who were suitable for in-label treatment with RUX were eligible and could be included either before (479 previously RUX-naïve [Arm A]) or after the start of treatment (464 RUX-experienced patients [Arm B]) and were followed over 36 months. Arm A showed rapid (≤ 6 months), sustained improvements from baseline in all efficacy outcomes and most QOL measures. Both arms showed an ~17% increase in the proportion of patients experiencing a normal German QOL during follow-up. Arm B entered the study with better outcomes and QOL than Arm A, with outcomes generally remaining stable over time. Adverse events were less common than in registrational trials, possibly due, in part, to lower real-world RUX dosing. Survival was comparable to published data. The JAKoMo study demonstrates that real-world RUX treatment of MF promotes significant and sustained clinical and QOL benefits, including improvement of general health and alleviation of MF-associated fatigue. Maximum sustained responses were generally achieved within 6 months and associated with fewer adverse events than in published randomized trials, which may reflect more conservative and personalized real-world dosing. Trial Registration: The JAKOMO trial: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05044026.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.