Evidence mapPaperPMID 40620155Full record

ReviewNanomedicine (London, England)2025

Research progress on mRNA drug delivery strategies in the nervous system.

Bo Yang, Anqi Liu, Xiaojing Li, Zhigang Miao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bo YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Anqi LiuInstitute of Neuroscience, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xiaojing LiDepartment of Neurology, Suzhou Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Suzhou, China.
Zhigang MiaoInstitute of Neuroscience, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been little progress in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) disorders in recent decades. To date, new therapeutic agents such as small molecule drugs, cytokines, monoclonal antibodies and vaccines targeting specific antigens are still in the research and development stage and have not yet entered clinical use. With the discovery of gene-editing technology and the development of new therapeutic strategies, mRNA has been developed and used as a new type of drug, showing potential application value in the treatment of various neurological diseases. However, mRNA drugs face difficulties in being delivered to the CNS to exert therapeutic effects. We conducted a review by searching the PubMed database for relevant literature up to now, focusing on the research progress of mRNA drug delivery systems in the nervous system and their applications in neurological diseases, explore the challenges and prospects of mRNA drugs in neurological diseases, and provide reference for the development and implementation of mRNA drugs for neurological diseases.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System DiseasesDrug Delivery SystemsNervous System DiseasesRNA, MessengerAnimalsHumansRNA, MessengerCNSdeliverydrugsmRNAnano

Identifiers

PMID40620155
PMCPMC12320854

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.