ArticleJAMIA open2025
Conversational health agents: a personalized large language model-powered agent framework.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Usability and User Experience Assessment of Health Care Conversational Agents Using Validated Subjective Instruments: Systematic Review and Comparative Analysis.JMIR human factors · 2026Pooled it
- Generative AI in Precision Nutrition: A Review of Current Developments and Future Directions.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Preliminary Evaluation of a Large Language Model-Powered Chatbot for Osteoporosis Self-Management Education: Formative Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- A comprehensive survey of AI agents in healthcare.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026Review
- A framework for longitudinal health AI agents.Nature health · 2026Article
- Personalised health plan development using agentic AI in Singapore's national preventive care programme: a pilot study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Digital Technologies That Support Meaningful Connections in Care Homes: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis in primary care using multi-agent systems.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Management of Large Language Model-Based Exercise and Health Guidance: A China-Anchored, Comparatively Informed Six-Dimensional Trigger Matrix and Lifecycle Governance Framework for the Wellness-to-SaMD Continuum.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Review
- Development and evaluation of an agentic LLM based RAG framework for evidence-based patient education.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Conversational Health Agents (CHAs) are interactive systems providing healthcare services, such as assistance and diagnosis. Current CHAs, especially those utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs), primarily focus on conversation aspects. However, they offer limited agent capabilities, specifically needing more multistep problem-solving, personalized conversations, and multimodal data analysis. We aim to overcome these limitations. Materials and methods: We propose openCHA, an open-source LLM-powered framework, designed to enable the development of conversational agents. OpenCHA offers a foundational and structured architecture and codebase, enabling researchers and developers to build and customize their CHA based on the specifics of their intended application. The framework leverages knowledge acquisition, problem-solving capabilities, multilingual, and multimodal conversations, and allows interaction with various AI platforms. We have released the framework as open source for the community on GitHub (https://github.com/Institute4FutureHealth/CHA and https://opencha.com). Results: We demonstrated the openCHA's capability to develop CHAs across multiple health domains using 2 demos and 5 use cases. In diabetic patient management, developed CHA achieved a 92.1% accuracy rate, surpassing GPT4's 51.8%. In food recommendations, developed CHA outperformed GPT4. The developed CHA excelled as an evaluator for mental health chatbots, recording the lowest Mean Absolute Error at 0.31, compared to competitors like GPT, Misteral, Gemini, and Claude. Additionally, the empathy enabled CHA identified emotional states with 89% accuracy, and in physiological data analysis of heart rate from Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals, the developed CHA achieved an mean absolute error of 2.83, far lower than GPT-4o's 8.93. Discussion: The openCHA framework enhances CHAs by enabling features such as explainability, personalization, and reliability through its integration with LLMs and external data sources. The developed CHAs face challenges like latency, token limits, and scalability. Future efforts will focus on improving planning robustness, enhancing accuracy and evaluation methods, and resolving user query ambiguity to further refine the framework's effectiveness. Conclusion: The diverse demos and use cases of openCHA demonstrate the framework's capacity to empower the development of a wide range of CHAs for various healthcare tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.