Evidence mapPaperPMID 40620478Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Conversational health agents: a personalized large language model-powered agent framework.

Mahyar Abbasian, Iman Azimi, Amir M Rahmani, Ramesh Jain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. A comprehensive survey of AI agents in healthcare.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahyar AbbasianDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-2625, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8448-3158
Iman AzimiDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-2625, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5003-299X
Amir M RahmaniDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-2625, United States.
Ramesh JainDepartment of Computer Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-2625, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Conversational Health Agents (CHAs) are interactive systems providing healthcare services, such as assistance and diagnosis. Current CHAs, especially those utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs), primarily focus on conversation aspects. However, they offer limited agent capabilities, specifically needing more multistep problem-solving, personalized conversations, and multimodal data analysis. We aim to overcome these limitations. Materials and methods: We propose openCHA, an open-source LLM-powered framework, designed to enable the development of conversational agents. OpenCHA offers a foundational and structured architecture and codebase, enabling researchers and developers to build and customize their CHA based on the specifics of their intended application. The framework leverages knowledge acquisition, problem-solving capabilities, multilingual, and multimodal conversations, and allows interaction with various AI platforms. We have released the framework as open source for the community on GitHub (https://github.com/Institute4FutureHealth/CHA and https://opencha.com). Results: We demonstrated the openCHA's capability to develop CHAs across multiple health domains using 2 demos and 5 use cases. In diabetic patient management, developed CHA achieved a 92.1% accuracy rate, surpassing GPT4's 51.8%. In food recommendations, developed CHA outperformed GPT4. The developed CHA excelled as an evaluator for mental health chatbots, recording the lowest Mean Absolute Error at 0.31, compared to competitors like GPT, Misteral, Gemini, and Claude. Additionally, the empathy enabled CHA identified emotional states with 89% accuracy, and in physiological data analysis of heart rate from Photoplethysmography (PPG) signals, the developed CHA achieved an mean absolute error of 2.83, far lower than GPT-4o's 8.93. Discussion: The openCHA framework enhances CHAs by enabling features such as explainability, personalization, and reliability through its integration with LLMs and external data sources. The developed CHAs face challenges like latency, token limits, and scalability. Future efforts will focus on improving planning robustness, enhancing accuracy and evaluation methods, and resolving user query ambiguity to further refine the framework's effectiveness. Conclusion: The diverse demos and use cases of openCHA demonstrate the framework's capacity to empower the development of a wide range of CHAs for various healthcare tasks.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconversational health agentslarge language modelsopenCHAopen-source agents

Identifiers

PMID40620478
PMCPMC12228965

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.