SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Application of radiomics-based prediction model to predict preoperative lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predicting T790M mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer based on radiomics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- CT-based radiomics in predicting the efficacy of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- The diagnostic value of radiomics-based machine learning for lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of radiomics models based on imaging equipment in predicting prostate cancer (PCa) lymph node metastasis (LNM). Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Sinomed databases from their establishment until July 2024. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria and the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) tools were utilized to assess the quality of the studies. Indicators such as the pooled area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were computed to evaluate the predictive effect of radiomics technology on LNM of PCa. Results: A total of 1860 patients diagnosed with LNM of PCa through histological examination were included in this meta-analysis. The radiomics model for predicting LNM in PCa showed a pooled AUC value of 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.85 - 0.91]), with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.81 (95% CI [0.64 - 0.91]) and 0.85 (95% CI [0.75 - 0.91]), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 5.43 (95% CI [3.34 - 8.84]), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.22 (95% CI [0.12 - 0.43]), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 24.21 (95% CI [10.59 - 55.32]). The meta-analysis showed significant heterogeneity among the included studies. No threshold effect was detected. The subgroup analysis showed that the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression algorithm had the higher diagnostic sensitivity, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.96 (95% CI [0.90 - 1.00]) ( Conclusions: The predictive model based on radiomics features has the potential to serve as an auxiliary approach for predicting preoperative LNM of PCa. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier PROSPERO CRD42024575818.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.