Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40620894›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2025

Treatment of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer with radiotherapy - single-centre experience.

Artur Bandura, Paweł Tran Dinh, Anna Wrona, Krzysztof Konopa, Rafał Dziadziuszko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prognostic Role ofCancers · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Artur BanduraDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Paweł Tran DinhClinical Oncology Department, Voivodeship Oncology Center, Gdańsk, Poland.
Anna WronaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Krzysztof KonopaDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Rafał DziadziuszkoDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the world. Many attempts have been made to increase survival of this devastating disease, including the addition of local therapies in oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (OMD NSCLC). Oligometastatic disease is an intermediate state between a local and widely disseminated disease. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) in treatment of OMD NSCLC and to evaluate prognostic factors for survival. Material and methods: Medical records of 127 consecutive patients with OMD NSCLC who underwent SRT in University Clinical Centre in Gdańsk, Poland between 2016 and 2022 were obtained and clinical data were analysed for toxicity and efficacy. Results: There were 64.6% of patients with adenocarcinoma, 25.2% with squamous-cell carcinoma and 10.2% with other histological subtypes. Mean age was 66.9 years. Treatment was well tolerated in the majority of patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for synchronous OMD (sOMD) and metachronous OMD (mOMD) was 11.1 months and 14.4 months, respectively ( Conclusions: Radical treatment in OMD NSCLC should be judicious and reserved for selected patients. Stereotactic radiation therapy is an important tool in the management of OMD NSCLC.

Indexed as

local ablative therapynon-small cell lung canceroligometastatic diseaseradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID40620894
PMCPMC12224264

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.