ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2025
Machine learning detection of epileptic seizure onset zone from iEEG.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application of artificial intelligence technology in epilepsy.Acta epileptologica · 2026Review
- Unsupervised clustering of electroclinical features in temporal lobe epilepsy: A data-driven approach.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Article
- Localizing the epileptogenic zone in drug-resistant epilepsy based on ictal SEEG high-resolution time-frequency representation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Precision Neuro-Oncology in Glioblastoma: AI-Guided CRISPR Editing and Real-Time Multi-Omics for Genomic Brain Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Deep learning in intracranial EEG for seizure detection: advances, challenges, and clinical applications.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate identification of seizure onset zones (SOZ) is essential for the surgical treatment of epilepsy. This narrative review examines recent advances in machine learning approaches for SOZ localization using intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) data. Existing studies are analyzed while addressing key questions: What machine learning techniques are used for SOZ localization? How effective are these methods? What are the limitations, and what solutions can drive further progress in the field? This narrative review examined peer-reviewed studies that employed machine learning techniques for SOZ localization using iEEG data. The selected studies were analyzed to identify trends in machine learning applications, performance metrics, benefits, and challenges associated with SOZ identification. The review highlights the increasing adoption of machine learning for SOZ localization, mostly with supervised approaches. Particularly support vector machine (SVM) using high frequency oscillation (HFO) biomarker feature being the most prevalent. High accuracy and sensitivity, especially in studies with smaller sample sizes are reported. However, patient-wise validation reveals limited generalizability. Additionally, ambiguity in SOZ definition and the scarcity of open-access iEEG datasets continue to hinder progress and reproducibility in the field. Machine learning offers significant potential for advancing SOZ localization. Development of more robust algorithms, integration of multimodal data, and greater model interpretability, can improve model reliability, ensure consistency, and enhance real-world applicability, thereby transforming the future of SOZ localization.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.