ArticleMicroscopy research and technique2025
3D Microstructural Characterization of Human Deep Fascia Using Optical Projection Tomography, Digital Light Sheet Microscopy, and Magnetic Resonance Microscopy.
Article in Microscopy research and technique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fascia as a Functional System in Health and Disease: From Fundamental Biology to Assessment and Targeted Interventions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Histology of the fascial planes: a systematic review of the microstructural foundations of regional anesthesia.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- 3D Microstructural Characterization of Human Deep Fascia Using Optical Projection Tomography, Digital Light Sheet Microscopy, and Magnetic Resonance Microscopy.Microscopy research and technique · 2025Article
- Bio-tensegrity and extracellular matrix disruption in the pathogenesis of persistent post-operative pain: a hypothesis.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional histological methods provide limited insights into the complex 3D microstructure of fascia and its relationship to disease. This study explored the capacity of different 3D microscopy techniques for characterizing the microstructure of fascia lata (FL) and thoracolumbar fascia (TLF). Tissues from four donors were studied using optical projection tomography (OPT), digital light sheet (DLS) microscopy, and magnetic resonance microscopy (MRM). Samples for OPT and DLS were imaged with a custom OPT scanner and the DLS arm of a Leica Stellaris microscope, respectively. MRM was performed using a 9.4 T superconducting magnet and an NMR/MRI spectrometer. Reference histological evaluation was performed to guide the interpretation of 3D data. Image analyses were performed using FIJI and Ellipse software. DLS offered superior resolution, but all techniques revealed a trilaminar structure in both fasciae: a thick, collagen-rich intermediate layer flanked by thinner layers with loose connective tissue. The FL intermediate layer was thinner (210.5-258.7 μm) with longitudinally oriented collagen, while the TLF intermediate layer was thicker (302.3-343.6 μm) with both oblique and longitudinal fibers. The superficial layer in FL was thicker (128.8-161.5 μm) than in TLF (84.65-123.10 μm) across imaging modalities. The deep layer also varied between fasciae, with 54.3-73.8 μm in FL and 44.78-70.30 μm in TLF. Layer thickness measurements did not differ significantly across techniques. This study demonstrates the feasibility of different 3D microscopy techniques for visualizing and quantifying fascia extracellular matrix structure and organization, laying the groundwork for future investigations into potential structural alterations in disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.