ReviewCurrent opinion in critical care2025
Role of artificial intelligence in ICU therapeutic decision-making for severe infections.
Review in Current opinion in critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Characteristics, Empirical Antibiotic Appropriateness, and Outcomes of Gram-Positive Versus Gram-Negative Bacteremia in Emergency Department Patients with Sepsis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in medicine: a position paper by the Italian Society of Internal Medicine.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo discuss current and future role of artificial intelligence in predicting severe infections and supporting decisions on antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICU), focusing in particular on some relevant conceptual changes compared to classical clinical reasoning. RECENT
findingsSeveral studies have evaluated the ability of machine learning techniques for severe infection prediction, while other studies have explored the potential of large language models (LLM)-based tools to assist clinicians in deciding which antimicrobial agent(s) to prescribe to patients with severe infections. SUMMARY: The support of artificial intelligence for infection prediction and antimicrobial prescribing has shown the potential to improve the treatment of severe infections in ICU. However, the limited number of studies focused on ICU should be highlighted, along with the need to thoroughly address the issue of patients' privacy and to improve the ethical and legal frameworks for decision accountability, as well as the transparency and quality of training data. A standardized approach to the accuracy-interpretability trade-off would also be essential to outline a correct and shared approach both for the future conduct of studies and for the interpretation of their evidence for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.