ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2025
Impact of a computed tomography-based artificial intelligence software on radiologists' workflow for detecting acute intracranial hemorrhage.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the impact of a commercially available computed tomography (CT)-based artificial intelligence (AI) software for detecting acute intracranial hemorrhage (AIH) on radiologists' diagnostic performance and workflow in a real-world clinical setting.
methodsThis retrospective study included a total of 956 non-contrast brain CT scans obtained over a 70-day period, interpreted independently by 2 board-certified general radiologists. Of these, 541 scans were interpreted during the initial 35 days before the implementation of AI software, and the remaining 415 scans were interpreted during the subsequent 35 days, with reference to AIH probability scores generated by the software. To assess the software's impact on radiologists' performance in detecting AIH, performance before and after implementation was compared. Additionally, to evaluate the software's effect on radiologists' workflow, Kendall's Tau was used to assess the correlation between the daily chronological order of CT scans and the radiologists' reading order before and after implementation. The early diagnosis rate for AIH (defined as the proportion of AIH cases read within the first quartile by radiologists) and the median reading order of AIH cases were also compared before and after implementation.
resultsA total of 956 initial CT scans from 956 patients [mean age: 63.14 ± 18.41 years; male patients: 447 (47%)] were included. There were no significant differences in accuracy [from 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.00) to 0.99 (0.98-1.00),
conclusionAfter the implementation of CT-based AI software for detecting AIH, the radiologists' daily reading order was considerably reprioritized to allow more rapid interpretation of AIH cases without compromising diagnostic performance in a real-world clinical setting. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: With the increasing number of CT scans and the growing burden on radiologists, optimizing the workflow for diagnosing AIH through CT-based AI software integration may enhance the prompt and efficient treatment of patients with AIH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.