ArticleBMJ open2025
Exploring tuberculosis patients' preferences for AI-assisted remote health management services in China: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEffective health management is critical for patients with tuberculosis (TB), especially given the need for long-term treatment adherence and continuous monitoring. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted remote health management services offer a promising solution to increase patient engagement, optimise follow-up and improve treatment outcomes. However, little research has explored TB patients' preferences for these services, and no discrete choice experiment (DCE) has systematically investigated how they make trade-offs between different service attributes. This study aims to (1) identify key attributes of AI-assisted remote health management services that influence TB patients' choices, (2) assess how patients with TB evaluate trade-offs between different service options using a DCE and (3) examine whether preferences vary by sociodemographic characteristics and health system factors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Six attributes were identified through a literature review, focus group discussions and expert consultations. A fractional factorial design was used to generate choice sets while maintaining statistical efficiency and minimising respondent burden. The DCE will be analysed using a multinomial logit model to estimate average preferences. A mixed logit model will be applied to explore preference heterogeneity among participants, incorporating interaction terms with sociodemographic and attitudinal variables. Stratified and latent class analyses will also be considered to further investigate sources of heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital. All participant data will remain anonymous, and individuals may withdraw from the study at any time. The findings will inform the development of patient-centred AI-assisted TB management strategies and contribute to broader policy discussions on AI integration in TB care. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications, policy briefs, conferences and online platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.