ArticleScientific reports2025
Trends in meat consumption and its association with menarche timing: findings from CHNS 1997-2015.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evidence linking meat intake to early menarche has been contradictory. We aimed to estimate meat intake and time trends among Chinese girls, and to assess the associations between long-term meat intake and menarche. This study used seven rounds of data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey, and 5175 girls aged 6-17 years were analyzed. Cox proportional hazard and restricted cubic spline models were used to analyze the associations and dose-response relationships between meat intake and menarche. Over the 15-year period, total meat intake almost doubled, and meat subtype consumption increased among Chinese girls. Increased total meat, red meat, white meat and poultry intake was significantly associated with the risk of earlier menarche. When extreme tertiles were compared, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for total meat, red meat, white meat and poultry were 1.28 (1.06-1.54), 1.19 (1.01-1.42), 1.23 (1.02-1.47) and 1.23 (1.06-1.44), respectively. An approximately U-shaped association was observed: compared to the reference (75 g/day), early menarche risk decreased at lower intakes (25-75 g/day), showed no association at moderate intakes (75-175 g/day), and increased significantly at higher intakes (> 175 g/day). Increased long-term meat consumption was associated with an increased risk of early menarche in Chinese girls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.