Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40624426›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025

Distal esophageal acid exposure and poor esophageal clearance correlate with probability of progression in Barrett's esophagus as determined by the tissue systems pathology test.

Sven E Eriksson, Jennifer M Kolb, Johnathan Nguyen, Inanc S Sarici, Ping Zheng, Shahin Ayazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sven E ErikssonForegut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jennifer M KolbVatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Johnathan NguyenForegut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Inanc S SariciForegut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ping ZhengForegut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Shahin AyaziForegut Division, Surgical Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. shahin.ayazi@ahn.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8113-9164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk of progression from non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE) to high grade dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma (HGD/EAC) is low but variable. Biomarker assays can aid with risk stratification to optimize surveillance for NDBE. The role of diagnostic esophageal testing in prognosticating progression is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether esophageal physiology parameters correlate with a validated biomarker for BE risk progression.

methodsPatients with NDBE, including histology confirmed intestinal metaplasia < 1 cm, had their pathology specimen analyzed using a validated tissue systems pathology test with 9 biomarkers (TSP-9). This assay uses immunohistochemistry and digital pathology analysis to provide a 5-year risk of progression to HGD/EAC. These patients also underwent esophageal pH-monitoring and high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM). Correlation analyses were performed between TSP-9 risk percent and esophageal testing.

resultsA total of 59 patients [52.5% male; mean (SD) age 59 (14)] were included (40 NDBE, 19 < 1 cm IM) between 2021 and 2023. The median (IQR) TSP-9 value for 5-year risk of progression was low at 2.0% (2.0-3.0%). There were 8 (13.6%) statistical outliers with higher risk ranging from 5.0 to 10.0%. Risk of progression in the entire cohort was directly correlated with physiology testing parameters including DeMeester score (R = 0.30), acid exposure time (AET) (R = 0.34), duration of longest reflux episode on pH-monitoring (R = 0.30), and % incomplete bolus clearance on HRIM (R = 0.35) (p < 0.05 for all). In a subgroup of 19 patients with < 1 cm IM, risk of progression had a stronger correlation with DeMeester score (R = 0.65), AET (R = 0.67), supine AET (R = 0.70), number of reflux episodes on pH-monitoring (R = 0.50) and % incomplete bolus clearance on HRIM (R = 0.68) (p < 0.05 for all).

conclusionThere was a direct correlation between 5-year risk of progression to HGD/EAC using TSP-9 and distal esophageal acid exposure and poor esophageal clearance among patients with NDBE that was even stronger in those with < 1 cm of IM. These findings suggest that esophageal physiology testing may have value in predicting risk progression in BE.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagusGastroesophageal RefluxAgedBiomarkersDisease ProgressionEsophageal pH MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleManometryMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentBiomarkersBarrett’s esophagusDysplasiaEsophageal pH-monitoringHigh-resolution manometryProgression

Identifiers

PMID40624426
PMCPMC12287244

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.