ArticleNutrition journal2025
Associations between dietary macronutrient quality and odds of hyperlipidemia: findings from the NEC-Biobank cohort.
Article in Nutrition journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAssociations between the overall quality of dietary macronutrients and the odds of hyperlipidemia remain unknown. This study aimed to first investigate the aforementioned associations, applying a novel multidimensional macronutrient quality index (MQI).
methodsA large cross-sectional study (2018–2020) was carried out among 14,544 participants aged 18–79 years from the NEC-Biobank cohort (Northeast region, China). Dietary information was collected from a validated 110-item food frequency questionnaire. MQI was calculated based on fat quality index (FQI), protein quality index (PQI), and carbohydrate quality index (CQI). Binary logistic regression models were used to assess the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsHigher MQI was associated with significantly reduced odds of hyperlipidemia (ORtertile 3 vs. tertile 1 = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75–0.90; P trend < 0.001). For MQI’s sub-indices, higher FQI (ORtertile 3 vs. tertile 1 = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77–0.91; P trend < 0.001) as well as higher PQI (ORtertile 3 vs. tertile 1 = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79–0.94; P trend < 0.001) were associated with lower odds of hyperlipidemia.
conclusionsOur findings suggested that intake of high-quality macronutrients was associated with reduced odds of hyperlipidemia. These findings contribute novel knowledge to the field of nutrition and metabolic diseases, and lay the foundation for future studies. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.