ReviewNMR in biomedicine2025
Ultrafast Imaging of Physiological Brain Pulsations With Magnetic Resonance Encephalography-From Noise to Predictive Clinical Biomarker.
Review in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A conversation on human brain clearance.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Physical exercise as a non-pharmacological strategy to enhance glymphatic function.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Sleep Alters the Velocity of Physiological Brain Pulsations in Humans.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Real-time Imaging of Neurofluid and Neurovascular Dynamics Using Ultrafast Flow-weighted Echo-Planar Imaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Simultaneous real-time imaging of upper cervical cerebrospinal fluid and vascular dynamics using ultrafast inflow-weighted EPI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- The Glymphatic-Venous Axis in Brain Clearance Failure: Aquaporin-4 Dysfunction, Biomarker Imaging, and Precision Therapeutic Frontiers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Ultrafast Imaging of Physiological Brain Pulsations With Magnetic Resonance Encephalography-From Noise to Predictive Clinical Biomarker.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade, novel in vivo imaging techniques have revealed that physiological pulsations drive the transport of brain solutes and that impairment of fluid flow precedes certain neuropathologies. Although the pioneering investigations on brain solute transport mechanisms mainly employed imaging of exogenous tracers, novel advanced ultrafast functional MRI sequences enable critical sampling of propagating physiological pulsations driving the brain fluids devoid of aliased mixing of signals. In this review, we summarize the emerging magnetic resonance encephalography (MREG) technique, beginning with a historical perspective and physiological background of the phenomena of brain pulsatility as measured in the parenchyma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We give a detailed account of how functional contrast mechanisms evident in the T2(*)-weighted MREG signal enable the simultaneous mapping of three distinct physiological signals. Our narrative review continues with an account of signal analysis and methodological considerations arising from 12 years of experience in ultrafast brain scanning. Our review concludes with a presentation of how sleep-related physiological changes in the driving pulsations influence solute transport in a healthy brain and our perspective on the potential of these pulsations as emerging biomarkers for predictive, diagnostic, and treatment monitoring in the context of Alzheimer's disease and other central nervous system (CNS) conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.