ArticleJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2025
Clinical Relevance of Gastric Emptying Time in Functional Dyspepsia.
Article in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effects of Physical Activity on Functional Dyspepsia: A Mendelian Randomization and Randomized Controlled Study.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
- Functional Dyspepsia and Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy: Why 4-Hour Imaging and a 255-kcal Meal Matter.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: This study evaluates the clinical significance of the gastric emptying time (GET) in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). Methods: This retrospective study included 89 patients who visited the clinic with indigestion between 2021 and 2022. FD was diagnosed and categorized into 3 subtypes: postprandial distress syndrome, epigastric pain syndrome, and overlap type, following the Rome IV criteria. GET was assessed using Results: Of the 89 patients studied, 46 were diagnosed with FD. The remaining 43 patients, who did not meet the Rome IV criteria, were included as the control group. Patients with FD exhibited a higher incidence of smoking, a higher body mass index, and a higher incidence of diabetes than the non-FD group. GET and T Conclusion: GET did not significantly differ among FD patients or its subtypes, despite a lower gastric retention rate in FD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.