ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025
Developing a molecular diagnostic model for heatstroke-induced coagulopathy: a proteomics and metabolomics approach.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heatstroke (HS) is becoming more concerning, with coagulopathy contributing to higher mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the metabolomic and proteomic profiles associated with heatstroke-induced coagulopathy (HSIC) and to develop a molecular diagnostic model based on proteomic and metabolomic patterns. Methods: This study included 41 HS patients from the Department of Critical Care Medicine at a comprehensive teaching hospital. Plasma proteins and metabolites from HSIC and non-heatstroke-induced coagulopathy (NHSIC) patients were compared using LC-MS/MS. Multivariate and univariate statistical analyses identified differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) and metabolites (DEMs). Functional annotation and pathway enrichment analyses were performed using the GO and KEGG databases, and machine learning models were developed using candidate proteins selected by LASSO and Boruta algorithms to diagnose HSIC. Finally, bioinformatic analysis was used to integrate the results of proteomics and metabolomics to find the potential mechanisms of HSIC. Results: A total of 41 patients participated in the study, with 11 cases in the HSIC group and 30 cases in the NHSIC group. Significant differences were observed between the groups in temperature, heart rate, white blood cell count, platelet count, liver function, coagulation markers, APACHE II score, and GCS score. Survival analysis revealed that the heatstroke group had a higher mortality risk. A total of 125 DEPs and 110 DEMs were identified, primarily enriched in energy regulation-related pathways and lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Additionally, three optimal predictive models (AUC >0.9) were developed and validated for classifying HSIC from HS individuals based on proteomic patterns and machine learning, with the logistic regression model showing the best diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.979, sensitivity = 81.8%, specificity = 96.7%), highlighting lactate dehydrogenase A chain (LDHA), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), prothrombin and glucan-branching enzyme (GBE) as key predictors of HSIC. Conclusion: The study uncovered critical metabolic and protein changes linked to heatstroke, highlighting the involvement of energy regulation, lipid metabolism, and carbohydrate metabolism. Building on these findings, an optimal machine learning diagnostic model was developed to boost the accuracy of HSIC diagnosis, integrating LDHA, NGAL, prothrombin, and GBE as key biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.