ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Bilateral atypical ovarian masses: don't overlook a functional gonadotropic pituitary adenoma.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hyperprolactinemia and Brain Health: Exploring the Gut-Brain Axis and Therapeutic Strategies.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional gonadotroph adenoma (FGA) is a rare condition associated with secretion of biologically active gonadotropins which affect reproductive organs. In women of reproductive age, it has been reported as a cause of spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurring outside the context of assisted reproductive technology (ART). In rare instances, FGA may present as suspicious ovarian masses, leading to an overlooked pituitary disorder. We report the case of a 34-year-old woman initially suspected of having a bilateral ovarian tumor with a borderline component due to thick-walled cystic masses. She underwent pelvic surgery, resulting in an oophorectomy. However, a few weeks postoperatively, the sudden onset of galactorrhea prompted further investigation, revealing hyperprolactinemia, FSH hypersecretion, and low LH levels. Ultimately, the diagnosis of FGA was established. A literature review was conducted to analyze similar cases where patients underwent ovarian surgery without prior hormonal assessment or suspicion of pituitary pathology, only to be diagnosed with FGA later. Thirteen additional cases were identified, including ovarian cysts and two cases of suspicious ovarian masses, with diagnostic delays ranging from 1.5 to 10 years. This case highlights the importance of considering FGA in the differential diagnosis of bilateral ovarian masses to avoid unnecessary surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.