ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Optimized prediction of diabetes complications using ensemble learning with Bayesian optimization: a cost-efficient laboratory-based approach.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: The increasing global prevalence of diabetes has led to a surge in complications, significantly burdening healthcare systems and affecting patient quality of life. Early prediction of these complications is critical for timely intervention, yet existing models often rely heavily on clinical indicators while underutilizing fundamental laboratory test parameters. This study aims to bridge this gap by leveraging the 12 most frequently tested laboratory indicators in diabetic patients to develop an optimized predictive model for diabetes complications. Methods: A comprehensive dataset was established through meticulous data collection from a high-volume tertiary hospital, followed by extensive data cleaning and classification. Various machine learning classifiers, including Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), were trained on this dataset to evaluate their predictive performance. We further introduced an ensemble learning model with Bayesian optimization to enhance accuracy and cost-efficiency. Additionally, feature importance analysis was conducted to refine the model by reducing testing costs while maintaining high predictive accuracy. Results: Our ensemble model with Bayesian optimization demonstrated superior performance, achieving over 90% accuracy in predicting various diabetic complications, with an outstanding 98.50% accuracy and 99.76% AUC for diabetic nephropathy. Feature correlation analysis enabled a refined model that not only improved predictive accuracy but also reduced overall medical costs by 2.5% through strategic feature elimination. Conclusions: This study makes three key contributions: (1) Development of a high-quality dataset based on fundamental laboratory indicators, (2) Creation of a highly accurate predictive model using ensemble learning and Bayesian optimization, particularly excelling in diabetic nephropathy prediction, and (3) Implementation of a cost-efficient diagnostic approach that reduces testing expenses without compromising accuracy. The proposed model provides a strong foundation for future research and practical clinical applications, demonstrating the potential of integrating machine learning with cost-conscious medical testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.