ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Delivering social and public health programmes through community arms of professional football clubs.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Men's health, physical activity, and ageing in a professional football club community organization programme.Health promotion international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community arms of professional football clubs have become key third-sector players in mitigating health and social inequalities. This paper examines the factors affecting their capacity for delivering social and public health programmes in the community setting. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 community staff members from the community arms of 22 professional football clubs and one non-professional club. This provided the basis for an interpretive thematic analysis which led to the development of three themes: 'from football club community departments to charitable arms', 'the reach of community programmes', and 'challenges and opportunities of delivering social and public health programmes via community football club arms'. Charitable status has created more funding opportunities, enabling community arms to better prioritize community needs. The expanding reach of community programmes delivers social and health benefits to children, adults, and older adults (65 and over) from diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds. However, numerous challenges and opportunities were reported as affecting community arms' capacity to deliver these programmes. Safeguarding is a challenge, but partnerships offer an opportunity to address it. Co-dependency with the football club presents both challenges and opportunities for community arms. Staffing and facilities, funding applications and reporting on programmes, were all identified as challenges. Our findings highlight eight key recommendations specific to areas of oversight in the community arms of football clubs, including professional development, partnership working, board members, resourcing, funding, programme reporting, and conflicts of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.