Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626462›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

Delivering social and public health programmes through community arms of professional football clubs.

Jordan Maclean, Alice MacLean, Cindy M Gray, Stephanie Chambers, Craig Donnachie, Russell Jago, Kate Hunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jordan MacleanInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4267-0518
Alice MacLeanInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
Cindy M GraySchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK.
Stephanie ChambersSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9607-6242
Craig DonnachieDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK.
Russell JagoPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
Kate HuntInstitute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HIPS/18/16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community arms of professional football clubs have become key third-sector players in mitigating health and social inequalities. This paper examines the factors affecting their capacity for delivering social and public health programmes in the community setting. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 community staff members from the community arms of 22 professional football clubs and one non-professional club. This provided the basis for an interpretive thematic analysis which led to the development of three themes: 'from football club community departments to charitable arms', 'the reach of community programmes', and 'challenges and opportunities of delivering social and public health programmes via community football club arms'. Charitable status has created more funding opportunities, enabling community arms to better prioritize community needs. The expanding reach of community programmes delivers social and health benefits to children, adults, and older adults (65 and over) from diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds. However, numerous challenges and opportunities were reported as affecting community arms' capacity to deliver these programmes. Safeguarding is a challenge, but partnerships offer an opportunity to address it. Co-dependency with the football club presents both challenges and opportunities for community arms. Staffing and facilities, funding applications and reporting on programmes, were all identified as challenges. Our findings highlight eight key recommendations specific to areas of oversight in the community arms of football clubs, including professional development, partnership working, board members, resourcing, funding, programme reporting, and conflicts of interest.

Indexed as

Health PromotionPublic HealthSoccerAdultHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative Researchcommunity armsprofessional football clubssocial and public health programmes

Identifiers

PMID40626462
PMCPMC12235519

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.