SynthesisActa parasitologica2025
Human Leishmaniasis in Algeria: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Acta parasitologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLeishmaniasis remains a significant public health concern in Algeria, where both cutaneous and visceral forms are endemic. This systematic review aimed to assess the prevalence and spatial distribution of human leishmaniasis in Algeria, as well as the associated diagnostic methods and risk factors.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ResearchGate for studies published from January 2000 to March 2025. Eligible studies were required to focus on human leishmaniasis in Algeria and report prevalence data using cross-sectional or descriptive designs. Data were extracted on study location, sample size, diagnostic methods, and prevalence. Spatial analysis was performed using ArcGIS.
resultsThirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most (76.9%) focused on cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), with a concentration of studies in northeastern Algeria. Giemsa-stained smear microscopy was the most frequently used diagnostic method (84.6%), while PCR techniques were employed in a minority of studies. The estimated regional prevalence of CL was 46.65%, with regional rates ranging from 8.7% (Constantine) to 100% (M'sila). Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) showed a prevalence of 25.8%, peaking at 92.3% in Oran. One study reported mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL) with a 100% prevalence in Tizi Ouzou.
conclusionLeishmaniasis, particularly the cutaneous form, remains highly endemic in Algeria, with significant regional disparities. Continued epidemiological monitoring and the the large use of molecular diagnostic tools are essential to improve disease surveillance and control efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40627072What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.