ArticlePloS one2025
Exploratory analysis of critical event phases and the impact of team size and performance levels in 24 hour ultra cycling.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the complex dynamics of rank-order stability by analyzing the current-to-final rank difference (CFRD), a metric that provides a dynamic view of rank fluctuations and their impact on the final ranking. This approach enables the identification of critical event phases that significantly influence the final rank. Specifically, we examine how varying team sizes and performance levels shape temporal trends in CFRD during 24-hour cycling races. A comprehensive dataset covering four consecutive years (2019-2022) of a 24-hour cycling race on a 17.9 km repetitive driven road track, encompassing diverse team sizes (solo rider, or teams of 4 and 10), is used. The results indicate significant interactions between time, team size, and performance F(18.04) = 1.74; p = 0.03). As the race progresses, the final standings become progressively more predictable. Solo riders exhibit the least clarity in their final standing throughout the race. In contrast, larger teams achieve a clearer indication of their final ranking earlier in the race. Medium-performance teams, especially solo riders, show lower clarity in their final standing across the race duration, whereas high- and low-performance teams tend to exhibit more predictable outcomes at earlier stages of the race. Overall, this study advances our understanding of endurance team cycling, and offers valuable insights for strategic decision-making and race optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.