Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40627664›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Exploratory analysis of critical event phases and the impact of team size and performance levels in 24 hour ultra cycling.

Carlo Dindorf, Jonas Dully, Lukas Maurer, Stephan Becker, Steven Simon, Eva Bartaguiz, Michael Fröhlich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlo DindorfDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0378-8481
Jonas DullyDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6822-0697
Lukas MaurerDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.
Stephan BeckerDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0115-7064
Steven SimonDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.
Eva BartaguizDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.
Michael FröhlichDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1982-6374

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the complex dynamics of rank-order stability by analyzing the current-to-final rank difference (CFRD), a metric that provides a dynamic view of rank fluctuations and their impact on the final ranking. This approach enables the identification of critical event phases that significantly influence the final rank. Specifically, we examine how varying team sizes and performance levels shape temporal trends in CFRD during 24-hour cycling races. A comprehensive dataset covering four consecutive years (2019-2022) of a 24-hour cycling race on a 17.9 km repetitive driven road track, encompassing diverse team sizes (solo rider, or teams of 4 and 10), is used. The results indicate significant interactions between time, team size, and performance F(18.04) = 1.74; p = 0.03). As the race progresses, the final standings become progressively more predictable. Solo riders exhibit the least clarity in their final standing throughout the race. In contrast, larger teams achieve a clearer indication of their final ranking earlier in the race. Medium-performance teams, especially solo riders, show lower clarity in their final standing across the race duration, whereas high- and low-performance teams tend to exhibit more predictable outcomes at earlier stages of the race. Overall, this study advances our understanding of endurance team cycling, and offers valuable insights for strategic decision-making and race optimization.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceBicyclingHumans

Identifiers

PMID40627664
PMCPMC12237058

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.