ArticleJMIR aging2025
Development and Validation of a Rule-Based Natural Language Processing Algorithm to Identify Falls in Inpatient Records of Older Adults: Retrospective Analysis.
Article in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In order to address fall underestimation by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) in clinical settings, information from clinical notes could be incorporated via natural language processing (NLP) as a possible solution. However, its application to inpatient notes has not been fully investigated. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a rule-based NLP algorithm to identify falls based on inpatient admission notes from older patients. Methods: This retrospective study used 12-year electronic inpatient records of patients aged ≥65 years from public hospitals in Hong Kong. A random sample of 1000 patients was drawn to develop the NLP algorithm. Manual review was the gold standard for assessing the algorithm's performance, with sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score calculated at the record, episode, and patient levels. In addition, the study compared the number of falls identified by ICD codes and clinical notes independently and combined. Results: Our rule-based NLP algorithm showed excellent performance, with a sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score of 93.3%, 99.0%, 87.5%, and 0.903 at the record and episode levels, and 92.9%, 98.3%, 89.7%, and 0.912 at the patient level. The combined identification strategy using ICD codes and the NLP method provided the most comprehensive capture of fall-related episodes and fallers. Conclusions: The NLP method proved efficient and accurate in detecting falls from clinical notes in inpatient episodes. For comprehensive capture of fall episodes and fallers, we recommend the combined use of the NLP algorithm and ICD codes, which should be applied in future fall epidemiology studies and clinical practice for identifying high-risk groups of fall interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.