ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2025
The Functional Topology of Phenylpiperazinium Agonists and Antagonists on the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Landscape: Pointing the Way for Future Therapeutic Management of Inflammation and Neuropathic Pain.
Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in pain modulation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ganglionic blocker 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenylpiperazinium (diMPP) has agonist activity on a variety of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). Recently, the related compound 1,1-diethyl-4-phenylpiperazinium (diEPP) has been used as a scaffold for the development of compounds with selectivity for homomeric α7 and α9 nAChRs, with the specific activity profiles depending on the side groups present on the phenyl group. We surveyed the activity of a family of phenylpiperazinium compounds with systematically designed differences in the base nitrogen and/or the phenyl side groups, on different nAChR subtypes. We evaluated activity on adult muscle type (α1β1εδ), ganglionic-like (α3β4), high affinity brain type (α4β2), and homomeric α7 and α9 nAChRs. In general, compounds with the dimethyl base group had the best activity for heteromeric receptors and homomeric α7 receptors. This activity could be tuned by the specific phenyl side groups. In contrast to the other subtypes studied, α9 receptors were better activated by analogs with larger alkyl groups on the base nitrogen, especially when the groups were asymmetrical on the base nitrogen, such that ethylmethyl-phenylpiperaziniums and propylmethyl-phenylpiperaziniums were more active on α9 than diethyl-phenylpiperaziniums. Our results may prove especially useful for the development of new drugs to treat inflammation and pain by targeting α9 nAChRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.