ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
VINCENT: A randomized-controlled trial evaluating venetoclax plus azacitidine versus intensive chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, NPM1-mutated AML.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05904106 (Venetoclax Plus Azacitidine Versus Standard Intensive Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Venetoclax Plus Azacitidine Versus Standard Intensive Chemotherapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and NPM1 Mutations Eligible for Intensive Treatment
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intensive Induction in AML in the Era of Venetoclax: A Standing Count for "7 + 3"?American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Metabolic Signaling Meets Epigenetic Regulation: How Protein Lactylation Remodels the Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Gastric Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For younger, medically fit patients with NPM1-mutated, FLT3-wildtype acute myeloid leukemia (AML) intensive chemotherapy represents standard of care (SOC), with complete remission (CR) rates observed in up to 85% of patients and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 40-50%. However, significant toxicity and need for hospitalization pose challenges on patients' outcome and quality of life (QoL). Venetoclax (VEN) combined with azacitidine (AZA) has demonstrated encouraging efficacy in older, unfit AML patients, achieving high CR/CRi rates and promising OS with lower toxicity. Prospective, randomized data comparing VEN/AZA to SOC in younger, fit patients are currently missing. VINCENT is a randomized-controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority, phase 2 trial (NCT05904106) evaluating VEN/AZA versus SOC in adults aged 18-70 years with newly diagnosed, NPM1-mutated, FLT3-wildtype AML. Patients medically fit for intensive chemotherapy (ECOG ≤ 2) with adequate organ function are eligible, while patients with relapsed/refractory AML or prior cytotoxic treatment are excluded. A total of 146 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either VEN/AZA or SOC. Hematologic remission is evaluated according to ELN 2022 guidelines. The primary endpoint is the modified event-free survival, defined as either primary induction failure, hematologic relapse, molecular failure or death. Secondary endpoints include safety, tolerability, CR/CRi/CRh/CR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.