ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
A novel method to predict the haemoglobin concentration after kidney transplantation based on machine learning: prediction model establishment and method optimization.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnaemia is a common complication after kidney transplantation, and the haemoglobin concentration is one of the main criteria for identifying anaemia. Moreover, artificial intelligence methods have developed rapidly in recent years, are widely used in the medical field and have achieved good results.
objectiveTo optimize the process of constructing a clinical prediction model based on machine learning and improve related technologies. A classification prediction model for the haemoglobin concentration after kidney transplantation was constructed.
methodsReal-world data from 854 kidney transplant patients in a Grade A tertiary hospital were retrospectively extracted. An imputation method combining the K-nearest neighbour algorithm and multilayer perceptron was used to fill in missing values in the dataset. Recursive feature elimination and extreme gradient boosting were used to rank and screen the importance of patient features and reduce the dimensionality of the features. Before the classification prediction model was established, the number of classification categories was determined first, and the optimal ideal cluster was approximated by the ideal cluster under each classification number and the similarity between the ideal cluster and the actual cluster. Finally, five kinds of machine learning methods, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine, linear support vector classifier and support vector machine, were used to establish classification prediction models, and error-correcting output codes were used to optimize each model. A classification prediction model for abnormal haemoglobin concentrations after kidney transplantation was constructed, and the prediction effect was verified.
resultsThe imputation method combining the K-nearest neighbour algorithm and multilayer perceptron has a better effect on the imputation of missing values than do the commonly used imputation methods. Among the machine learning methods used for modelling, the prediction results of the tree model are improved to a certain degree after the error-correcting output code optimization. The final model with the best effect is optimized extreme gradient boosting, and the prediction accuracies before and after model optimization are 85.98% and 87.22%, respectively.
conclusionsThe accuracy of the machine learning classification prediction model established by the optimized modelling method and process reached 87.22%, which can assist doctors in preoperative risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.