ArticleMedicine2025
Causal relationship between primary biliary cholangitis on osteoporosis: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Osteoporosis in primary biliary cholangitis: from cholestasis to fracture prevention.Clinical and experimental hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This present study aims to investigate the relationship between primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and osteoporosis (OP) using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. A two-sample MR study was conducted to explore the association between PBC and OP. The inverse variance weighted test was primarily used to estimate causality. Horizontal pleiotropy was assessed using both MR-PRESSO and MR-Egger regression techniques. Cochran Q test was applied to examine heterogeneity among single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and a sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of each individual SNP on the MR analysis results. The two-sample MR analysis result showed a significant association between PBC and OP, with an inverse variance weighted odds ratio of 1.098 (95% confidence interval: 1.049-1.150,and a P = 5.41e-05). MR-Egger regression indicated no bias due to genetic pleiotropy (intercept = 0.007, SE = 0.022, P = .754). Cochran Q test revealed no significant heterogeneity (Q = 27.494, P = .236). Furthermore, leave-one-out analysis confirmed the robustness of our findings, as the results remained consistent even when individual SNPs were excluded. This study provides evidence supporting the notion that PBC may increase the risk of OP, enhancing our understanding of the association between PBC and OP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.