ArticleMedicine2025
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A bibliometric analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study analyzes the research hotspots and future directions of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
methodsRelevant literature was searched using the Web of Science database and analyzed using econometric tools such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer.
resultsA total of 145 articles were included in this study, involving 317 research institutions in 31 countries and regions. Acta Neuropathologica is a prominent journal in terms of issuance and influence, and countries such as the United States and Japan, as well as institutions such as the University of Pennsylvania, occupy an important position in the research. The keywords cover various aspects such as disease characteristics and gene mutations; highly-cited literature focuses on TDP-43 protein and C9orf72 gene mutations. Research hotspots include TDP-43 protein disease-driven pathomechanisms, RNA-related studies, clinical manifestations of the disease and genetic studies, etc. In recent years, research focus has shifted to RNA, C9orf72 gene and so on.
conclusionTo our knowledge, this study is the first econometric evaluation of the FTLD-ALS literature, and although there are limitations such as relying on the number of documents and citation relationships, and a single source of data, it provides a valuable reference for research in this field and helps to promote subsequent research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.